ref: mP PRO 1.34 beta
Please allow the keyword "interface" in units.
Now the keyword "interface" at the beginning of the unit's interface section is flagged as an error.
Changing this would make the whole interface/implementation methodology equivalent to the Delphi one.
"Interface" still not allowed in mP 4.00 bèta.
Please allow the keyword "interface" in unit
Please allow the keyword "interface" in unit
Last edited by Dany on 06 Aug 2010 11:55, edited 6 times in total.
Kind regards, Dany.
Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in... (L. Cohen)
Remember when we were young? We shone like the sun. (David Gilmour)
Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in... (L. Cohen)
Remember when we were young? We shone like the sun. (David Gilmour)
Hi,
suggestion noted, we will consider this.
Thanks
suggestion noted, we will consider this.
Thanks
LibStock
http://www.libstock.com/
mikroSDK
https://www.mikroe.com/mikrosdk
mikroBUS
https://www.mikroe.com/mikrobus
http://www.libstock.com/
mikroSDK
https://www.mikroe.com/mikrosdk
mikroBUS
https://www.mikroe.com/mikrobus
Re: [ACK] Please allow the keyword "interface" in unit
Keyword "Interface" still not allowed in mP 3.80.
Kind regards, Dany.
Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in... (L. Cohen)
Remember when we were young? We shone like the sun. (David Gilmour)
Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in... (L. Cohen)
Remember when we were young? We shone like the sun. (David Gilmour)
Re: Please allow the keyword "interface" in unit
Seconded (and thirded, fourthed etc.) - please implement this properly, along with an initialization section.
Borland have pretty much set the standard here so it's either open for improvement or, for immediate compatibility and general user satisfaction - it's surely worthwhile implementing the whole Borland approach instead of the current half-baked version.
Isn't it? Pretty-please?
Borland have pretty much set the standard here so it's either open for improvement or, for immediate compatibility and general user satisfaction - it's surely worthwhile implementing the whole Borland approach instead of the current half-baked version.
Isn't it? Pretty-please?
To err is human; to moo, bovine.
Re: Please allow the keyword "interface" in unit
Hi,
I have informed our developers on this issue.
We are planning to implement this in some future versions of the compiler.
Regards,
Filip.
I have informed our developers on this issue.
We are planning to implement this in some future versions of the compiler.
Regards,
Filip.