Forget it, I found a way

Compiler: Mikroc Pro for ARM version 6.2.0
Chip: STM32F030R8

This chip has 64K flash memory. I want to use one page (1K) to store parameters. Is it possible to hide this page from the linker?

Thanks Rajkovic for your attention and fast reply. Personally, I prefer to keep the benefits of the optimizer (without setting its level to zero) at the price of getting "false" warnings. Real warnings are those for declared but unused variables. I am quite satisfied with the fact that I can suppres...

Compiler: MikroC pro for ARM 6.2.0 The compiler keeps outputting warning messages "Variable 'n' has been eliminated by optimizer" despite the fact that 'n' is being used. In the past, declaring the variable as static avoided this false warning, but now, the static declaration fails to do that. I fou...

Thanks Jovana for your explanation. Without inhibiting the optimizer by setting its level to zero, I understand that this warning simply means that the compiler is able to bypass intermediary assignments and doesn't need temporary variables. So, I can remove them myself.

Thanks for your attention. Here is a piece of code which triggers the optimizer problem.

void alpha(void);

void main()
{
alpha();
while (1) {
}
}

void alpha()
{
char n;
long w;

w = 245000000;
n = (char) w;
TL1 = n;
}

Compiler: MikroC Pro for 8051 Version: 3.6.0 Chip: C8051F350 " 'n' has been eliminated by optimizer" This is a warning which I get many times, despite the fact that the "eliminated" variables are in use. The program works well, so I guess that this is a false warning which can be ignored? Is there a...

Thanks Petar for your answer. Don't work too hard, I already have the answer for my second question: there is no overlapping problem since the first handler instruction is a LJMP.
I still have an ics problem: I would like to have full control of registers to be saved, if possible.

Compiler mikroC PRO for 8051 version 3.6.0 Chip C8051F350 (Silabs) The ics command doesn't work. Compile the sample below and look at the generated assembly: it is the same, with or without the ics command Worse: since the code has more than 8 bytes, it overlaps the next interrupt function. Obviousl...

Disappointed, but thanks for answering

Given two functions alpha() and beta(), the "org" directive relocates alpha() at an absolute address A. My question is: how to relocate beta() at the end of alpha in mikroc pro for PIC?
Thanks in advance for any help.

Thanks for your answer, but it doesn't help: my question was about the simulator and not an hardware debugger. Anyway, it is not relevant anymore; I wanted to see the code to find why the boot loader which I am writing doesn't work. Meanwhile, I found it: it is a linker problem, so I am going to ope...

I hope that the picture is clear enough. What I want is to see the disassembly code with ROM address.
I guess that it is not possible here. I have it with Microhip's MPLAB and MPLABX.

The code window is greyed out, is it possible to make it visible?

Merci Paul pour ton aide. J'ai ete plutot choque d'apprendre que les fonctions string "n'aiment pas" les constantes. Biensur, il est facile de les re-programmer.